This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: REPOST: Announcing the basic-improvements and faster-compiler branches
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:42:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: REPOST: Announcing the basic-improvements and faster-compiler branches
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 06:41 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
That's why I said "assuming the branch has a reasonable checkin
policy", specifically to avoid this problem.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:07:29AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Assuming things on the faster-compiler-branch actually make the
compiler significantly faster, it should be a review limited to code
only, rather than design (IE don't ask the people to make massive
changes to patches because the reviewer thinks it would make it
I won't agree to this unconditionally. What if the patch
is really really gross and seen to be unmaintainable in
the long term?