This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ ABI Issues


On Tuesday, Aug 27, 2002, at 10:13 US/Pacific, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

I'll restrain my comments to one area only.

Please, let's use the versioning info that already exists. Currently,
the compiler ABI is tracked with __GXX_ABI_VERSION. For the 3.2.0
release, this value is 102.

If there is to be a -fabi=xxx switch, then please use this information.
The idea of having a "-fabi-newest" is completely relative and useless:
newest from what vantage point?
I agree; it would definitely make sense to say something like, '-fabi-version=102'.
Alternatively, should ABI fixes become so frequent as to make rolling __GXX_ABI_VERSION
each time impractical (hopefully not likely...), then perhaps we can key off dates --
say, '-fabi-version=20020827' ?

Another question is whether proprietary compilers (HP aC++, etc.) also support
__GXX_ABI_VERSION, or whether it would be better to pick a more, uh, neutral macro
name? What immediately comes to mind after that is a "#pragma abi-version ...."
directive. (I apologize if the ABI spec already addresses these issues; I am not
intimately familiar with it.)

My 2 zlotys,

--Zem
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]