This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
Neil Booth <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| Zack Weinberg wrote:-
| > TREE_LIST nodes, incidentally, have ridiculous overhead if being used
| > as plain old cons chains, or even alists. Four pointers (chain, type,
| > purpose, value) plus a whole word of flag bits which are generally
| > unused.
| I really hope this all gets fixed by moving to more "definite" structs,
| rather than a catch-all union for trees.
I agree with you. I even hope that some silly type-errors will be