This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>
Cc: Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 19:19:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20020825223508.GA5066@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0208251746470.31996-100000@nondot.org> <20020825230835.GC5066@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>

On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Chris Lattner wrote:
> 
> > Is there a reason that you'd like to have a SIMPLE form that is not in
> > SSA?
> > 
> Only that nobody has bothered implementing it.  We'd need to
>
Well, that and the fact that by encoding SSA into the IR you're
now forcing every transformation to know about SSA.  Not all of
them do.  In principle I don't see why dataflow and IR should be
tied to each other.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?
  - From: Chris Lattner

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: [tree-ssa] AST optimizer in C++?
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]