This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: endless loop in compute_inverse bootstrapping on alpha
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:55:36PM -0500, Brad Lucier wrote:
> > I prefer my patch because it makes an explicit assumption -- that
> > big-order pages can contain only one object -- verifies it, and then
> > uses values which are safe and predictable. And because it doesn't
> > require the inverse_table to be bigger.
> That's the patch that's tested at
I've gone ahead and checked it in.