This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Java inliner
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"java at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:42:12 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: RFC: Java inliner
- References: <15648.40350.493795.623862@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0207011455550.20102-100000@dberlin.org><15648.42609.739440.682415@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><orr8ici2sh.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><15659.62226.717520.170250@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><or4rf7j05w.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><15660.6835.58381.407065@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><or3cur37ee.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><15686.39279.721250.392094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><87u1m0ht41.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:
>
> Andrew> Okay, here it is. Looks like you were right.
> Andrew> [ new tree inliner that works with gcj ]
>
> I just got back from vacation, and I haven't seen any reply to
> Andrew's post.
>
> I'd like to see this, or Andrew's earlier inlining patch, go in. Can
> someone review it?
BTW, Jeff Sturm submitted a minor bug fix and a couple of additions to
my patch. I could re-submit incorporating his changes, but I don't
think it's necessary to do so for my patch to be reviewed.
Andrew.