This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 12:33:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?
--On Tuesday, August 06, 2002 09:30:30 PM +0200 Franz Sirl
On Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 17:54, Franz Sirl wrote:
while comparing i686-linux-gnu testsuite results, I noticed that
g++.pt/repo3.C fails at -O2 in 3.2, is this a regression or expected?
Ah, while we are at potential ABI problems, g++.abi/bitfields.C fails
with -funsigned-char on i686-linux-gnu.
Mark, what about these? Can we safely ignore them for 3.2?
I believe so. I thought Jason reviewed them.
I will take a look too -- can you point me at the original message?
Mark Mitchell email@example.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com