This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 12:33:00 -0700
Subject: Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?

--On Tuesday, August 06, 2002 09:30:30 PM +0200 Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:

On Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 17:54, Franz Sirl wrote:

Hi,

while comparing i686-linux-gnu testsuite results, I noticed that
g++.pt/repo3.C fails at -O2 in 3.2, is this a regression or expected?

Ah, while we are at potential ABI problems, g++.abi/bitfields.C fails
with -funsigned-char on i686-linux-gnu.

Mark, what about these? Can we safely ignore them for 3.2?

I believe so.  I thought Jason reviewed them.

I will take a look too -- can you point me at the original message?

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- Re: g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]