This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Default to --enable-threads=posix on Linux (was Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils)


At 11:31 06.08.2002, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 02:58:40PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Do it quickly, send me a patch, and we can obviate the debate by having
> the change in.  I just can't see holding up the release for that.

Here is the proposed minimum patch to default to --enable-threads=posix
unless either some other --enable-threads option or --disable-threads
is given on Linux. I don't see why somebody might want not to build thread
aware gcc/libstdc++ by default.

I've verified that configure with --disable-threads gives the configuration
which used to be, ie. no thread support and that no --*threads option given
to configure causes posix threads to be used.

Ok to commit to mainline/3.2 branch?
Uhm, wouldn't it be easier to put one test under *-*-linux* instead of duplicating it all over?

Franz.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]