This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I agree with both of these statements, but as I undertstand it that's
> not the whole issue. Jakub included a glibc version in his list of
> necessary infrastructure to get ABI compliance, and upgrading glibc on
> a running system is very different from upgrading the compiler and
> linker. Requiring glibc 2.2.5 to build a native compiler is not OK.
> How necessary it is I don't remember at the moment.
C++ binaries built for glibc 2.2.5 or later won't execute on a system
with glibc 2.2.4 or earlier.