This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 07:31:26 -0700
- Subject: Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
--On Monday, August 05, 2002 07:25:13 AM -0700 Richard Henderson
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 08:45:20AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
As long as there is a configure option to build anyway. That's an
awful lot of released systems you're talking about not building on!
So? If you're upgrading gcc, you can upgrade binutils too.
Agreed. On a system which supports the configury options discussed, they
should be used.
__cxa_atexit is something of a special case. It's not really necessary
for ABI compliance; programs that mix the two methods will work, modulo
the order of calls to destructors for objects with static storage duration,
and that ordering issue was not really considered a problem for years.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com