This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 07:25:13 -0700
Subject: Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
References: <200208050443.g754hHEi007363@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <20020805081107.X20867@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <m3y9blu3yw.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <20020805101159.Z20867@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20020805055711.A26901@twiddle.net> <20020805124520.GA5882@nevyn.them.org>

On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 08:45:20AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As long as there is a configure option to build anyway.  That's an
> awful lot of released systems you're talking about not building on!

So?  If you're upgrading gcc, you can upgrade binutils too.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]