This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1?

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:37:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1?
References: <20020721225632.A15491@lucon.org>

On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 10:56:32PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Linux/x86, I got
> 
> # ./xgcc -B../ ~/work/gnu/import/gcc-3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c -O -mcpu=i686 -march=i386
> # ./a.out
> zsh: 32558 segmentation fault  ./a.out
> 
> 

Since it is a known bug, will the patch enclosed here cause any harm?


H.J.

Attachment: gcc-var.patch
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1?
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1?
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]