This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux?
- From: David Ronis <ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca>
- To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
- Cc: ronis at onsager dot chem dot mcgill dot ca, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:51:40 -0400
- Subject: Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux?
- References: <3D370044.9837EBE5@superh.com><15671.2524.440138.818513@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca><3D371AE9.57ED585F@superh.com>
- Reply-to: ronis at onsager dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
Joern Rennecke writes:
> What I mean is that you only see regressions that are actual compiler
> failures, rather than randomly occuring problems with expect.
ldd `which expect`
libtcl8.3.so => /usr/local/lib/libtcl8.3.so (0x40017000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x400af000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x400b3000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400c9000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x400ee000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400f1000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) >
> I'm normally using expect 5.31.7 (Red Hat Linux 7.2), and tried 5.37
> for a change, without success. What does ldd say about your expect?