This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit?

From: Robert Schiele <rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:11:08 +0200
Subject: Re: performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit?
References: <20020712172233.GA8881@schiele.local> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0207171823430.26672-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:24:59PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > When compiling a program with a real huge switch statement, current
> > head revision takes almost infinite time.
> 
> If you haven't done so, please submit this via our bug tracking system
> (http://gcc.gnu.org) and drop me a note with the number of the problem
> report.

Ok, this is now c/7344. I just wanted to make sure first that such
things are considered as bugs and not as "expected behaviour" ;-)

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele			Tel.: +49-621-181-2517
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker	mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de

Attachment: msg00752/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit?
  - From: Robert Schiele
- Re: performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]