Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question

[Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>]

Excerpt of message (sent 21 June 2002) by James Michael DuPont:
> 
> > I seem to remember this same discussion a month or
> > two ago.  It didn't
> > lead anywhere then either, and it has nothing to do
> > with the topic of
> > this list.  
> Really? The interfaces of the gcc is not a topic? 

The interpretation of the GPL, and how or whether it applies to what
you're doing, and jurisprudence relevant to all of that, isn't the
topic of this list as I understand it.

> This is going towards the opening up of the interfaces
> of the gcc, that is very important.
> This list is for the further development of the gcc,
> I have been working on it as well and have a right to
> raise my issues and have them resolved. 
> 
> I am not going away untill they are.

Since this is an open list, I guess that's the end of the story.  Of
course, it doesn't mean that anyone has to pay any attention to what
you say, or reply to it.

I'm definitely done with this.

    paul