This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, mdupont777 at yahoo dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rms at gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:21:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question
> All I can tell is that there is no LEGAL problem with
> me doing this, if all my code is licensed under the
> GPL, it is not my problem if I used Files, XMLRPC or
> shared libs to access the gcc.
You can't even tell this. You really need to be more aware that copyright
problems are not as simple as you think. For instance if what you are doing
constitutes an inducement for people to do something which would itself
violate the copyright, then there might be issues of contributory
infringement, or even misuse of copyright.
Copyright issues are *not* simple. Please don't presume that they are, and
please do not expect to get free legal advice on this particular mailing list.
> So what if people can abuse it, people can abuse the
> gcc as it is, and you are not interested in helping
> the people who want to help you, but help the people
> who are out to create non-free tools. That is crazy.
It is also crazy to ignore possible legal problems ...
Please be clear I am not saying that what you are doing is problematical,
just that it may be, and it is your responsibility, not anyone else's,
to ensure that what you are doing conforms to the law of the land :-)