This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance

From: Graham Stott <graham dot stott at btinternet dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, law at redhat dot com, Jan Hubicka<jh at suse dot cz>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Diego Novillo<dnovillo at redhat dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Mark Mitchell<mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:50:34 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
References: <4103.1024608389@porcupine.cygnus.com> <3D1250D8.5CB7311@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20020620154308.A16872@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:

So, OK - that's it.  Addressof makes a MEM out of this register, so we
should accept it down the road.


Alternately, we may want to remove it from the reg_rtx array.


r~

There's also on place in reload () that uses PUT_MODE (reg, MEM)
on a reg which is an entry in the regno_reg_rtx array.

Graham

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
  - From: Michael Matz

References:
- Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
  - From: law
- Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]