This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Quality of GCC 3.1

From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: gcc at gnu dot org
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:20:59 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Quality of GCC 3.1
References: <20020617210500.GA28032@localhost.tpnet.pl><20020618145503.GL19604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

Jan Hubicka writes:
 > > a)	What is the reason of such big decrease in performance especially if
 > > 	exceptions and/or streams are used?
 > 
 > The exceptions got slower, because the tables are more compact. Is
 > exception delivery performance really problem for C++ programs?

If exceptions are very much slower it's bad news for Java.  On the
other hand, our binaries are a good deal bigger than we'd like them to
be...

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quality of GCC 3.1
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- Quality of GCC 3.1
  - From: Wit Jakuczun
- Re: Quality of GCC 3.1
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]