This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FDEs for virtual thunks

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Matthew Austern <austern at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:31:10 -0700
Subject: Re: FDEs for virtual thunks
References: <20020617171853.A14745@redhat.com> <D5EC832E-8251-11D6-8794-000393B2ABA2@apple.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 05:25:04PM -0700, Matthew Austern wrote:
> Does that imply that it would be safe to eliminate those FDEs if
> we change the mechanism so as to guarantee that we will
> always get a tail call?

As far as I'm concerned, yes.  Dunno what the debugger
would think about it once it comes to rely on them.

r~

References:
- Re: FDEs for virtual thunks
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: FDEs for virtual thunks
  - From: Matthew Austern

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]