This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
- From: Doug Warmke <doug at ikos dot com>
- To: dylan at q-games dot com, gcc at gnu dot org, robt at flyingpig dot com
- Cc: arnabs at ikos dot com, doug at ikos dot com, johnny at ikos dot com, vasu at ikos dot com
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
Guys,
I noticed on the main gcc-3.1 page that the Solaris platform
is not yet making use of dwarf object format. It's interesting that
you are experiencing the same problem on cygwin as I am experiencing
on Solaris 7 and 8.
We are currently experimenting with the latest available GNU ld
and gdb 5.1.1. Will keep you posted tomorrow.
Regards,
Doug
> From <dylan@q-games.com>(________-000000086447) Thu Jun 13 00:54:10 2002
>
> Hello there,
>
> My next stop was going to be the gdb and cygwin lists, however, gcc is the
> more complicated and experimental of the other two and I wanted to see if
> anyone else was experiencing problems on other platforms too.
>
> I compiled and installed the latest binutils which contains ld of course,
> do you think it might be a problem with ld on cygwin? If so, I'd better
> add "ld" to my list of mailing lists to post to :-(
>
> I haven't re-compiled cygwin itself into the dwarf2 format (don't know if
> its possible), do you think there might be problems with the linker linking
> together 2.95-3 compiled older libraries with 3.1 compiled dwarf2 ones?
>
> Regards
>
> ---------------------------------
> Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert.
> http://www.q-games.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Taylor" <robt@flyingpig.com>
> To: "Dylan Cuthbert" <dylan@q-games.com>; "Doug Warmke" <doug@ikos.com>;
> <gcc@gnu.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:57 PM
> Subject: RE: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
>
>
> > have you tried asking on the cygwin and gdb mailing lists to see if anyone
> > theres experienced similar problems? sounds like there might be some
> problem
> > with gdb interacting with cygwin's ld implementation when using dwarf2...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf Of
> > > Dylan Cuthbert
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:26 AM
> > > To: Rob Taylor; Doug Warmke; gcc@gnu.org
> > > Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
> > >
> > >
> > > I have tried re-winding to 5.1.1 but still have problems single stepping
> > > even a standard C++ Hello World program. It does get to the first line
> of
> > > code, but single stepping over library calls causes gdb to freeze.
> > >
> > > System is Cygwin 1.3.10, gcc 3.1 (pre-release or release), gdb 5.1.1/5.2
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert.
> > > http://www.q-games.com
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rob Taylor" <robt@flyingpig.com>
> > > To: "Doug Warmke" <doug@ikos.com>; <gcc@gnu.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:35 PM
> > > Subject: RE: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I've actually observed similar crashes with gdb5.2 and gcc 3.0.4!
> > > (specifically
> > > > the 20020401 cvs snaphot of gdb used by debian). Rewinding to 5.1.1
> solved
> > > issue
> > > > for me.
> > > >
> > > > Rob Taylor
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf
> Of
> > > > > Doug Warmke
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:06 AM
> > > > > To: gcc@gnu.org
> > > > > Subject: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > GCC Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > We recently installed gcc 3.1 and have successfully built our tree.
> > > > > When we try to debug using gdb 5.2, we get a core dump whenever
> > > > > trying to set a breakpoint. This is occuring on both Solaris 7
> > > > > and Solaris 8. Our code is C++ (not C). A sample transcript
> > > > > is shown below.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are there any known issues using this combination of GNU tools?
> > > > > Do we have to enable any special configuration or compiler options?
> > > > > The only thing I found on gcc.gnu.org was that gdb 5.1.1 or higher
> > > > > is required for debugging gcc 3.1 compiled code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and regards,
> > > > > Doug Warmke
> > > > > (408) 284-8554
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry, but it is still seg-faulting when I try to set a
> > > breakpoint.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jlo% /hq/scmtools/Test/SunOS5.8/bin/gdb shifter.mctsim
> > > > > > > > GNU gdb 5.2
> > > > > > > > Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > > > > > > > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
> License,
> > > and you
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
> certain
> > > > > > > > conditions.
> > > > > > > > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> > > > > > > > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty"
> for
> > > > > > > > details.
> > > > > > > > This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.8"...
> > > > > > > > (gdb) b main
> > > > > > > > Segmentation Fault
> > > > > > > > jlo%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>