This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: whither specs?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>,Mumit Khan <khan at nanotech dot wisc dot edu>,Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:49:15 -0700
- Subject: Re: whither specs?
- References: <20020612104536.A2525@redhat.com> <200206121826.g5CIQ5H02529@mururoa.inria.fr>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 08:26:05PM +0200, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>
> rth@redhat.com said:
> >> The driver should be doing this itself, IMO.
> > There are cons to DT_RPATH that in my opinion outweigh any benefit.
> > This has been dicussed before; search the archives.
>
> Right, I remember this discussion. But yet it seems to really be
> useful for some people all the more that since all the gcc librairies
> are dynamic by default, if you want to test multiple compilers, you
> have to specify each time not only a path but also a LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> or LD_RUN_PATH.
DT_RPATH is tricky with cross compiling. I don't want it in gcc.
H.J.