This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: is_predicate_p?

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: gdr at codesourcery dot com, tim at hollebeek dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:16:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: is_predicate_p?
References: <200206081250.IAA06610@caip.rutgers.edu> <m3sn3x6b70.fsf@merlin.nerim.net> <20020608213306.A883@hollebeek.com>

 > From: Tim Hollebeek <tim@hollebeek.com>
 > 
 > > | FWIW, I also think we should standardize on all of them returning
 > > | bool. 
 > > 
 > > I think that was agreed upon, in past discussions.
 > 
 > It might also be worthwhile insisting that they be pure.
 > -Tim

Unfortunately, that's almost impossible given our various "checking"
functions make unpure noreturn calls when an error is found.

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Director of Systems Architecture
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Solutions

References:
- Re: is_predicate_p?
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: is_predicate_p?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: is_predicate_p?
  - From: Tim Hollebeek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]