This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Speeding up GC

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Speeding up GC
References: <15612.51512.39000.908725@gargle.gargle.HOWL><20020604.072448.55836404.davem@redhat.com><200206041508.g54F8pK03041@quatramaran.ens.fr>

   From: Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>
   Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:08:51 +0200

   Actually, I can pinpoint it partly: going down such a path would
   1/ make gcc very much linux-dependent.

Actually, the dirty bit facility in question was orignally found to be
present under Solaris.  Every UNIX provides the mprotect+SIGSEGV
feature though.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Speeding up GC
  - From: Marc Espie

References:
- Re: Speeding up GC
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: Speeding up GC
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: Speeding up GC
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]