Re: looking for a proof for every optimizier flag (c/c++)

[Joerg Beyer <job at webde-ag dot de>]

Tim Prince wrote:
> On Monday 03 June 2002 04:04, Joerg Beyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a small piece of c/c++ source for (if possible)
> > every optimizer flag gcc has, to check/test/proof how good this
> > optimization works. e.g.: a simple function will benefit from
> > inlining, for loops will benefit from loop unrolling and so on.
> >
> > I would like to build a small benchmark (as seen on
> > http://cbench.sourceforge.net ) for each optimizer flag. If anybody
> > has a small piece of code that benefits from a single (or combination)
> > of optimizer flags, I would ask him to mail me this source.
> >
> > If there is general interest, than I could sumarize what I found out
> > into a small howto-use-optimizer-flags text and post it.
> >
> >    Thanks in advance
> >    Joerg
> >
> > ps: please cc me, since I am not on the list.
> This will be platform, (somewhat) language, and compiler version dependent.  
agreed. I want to measure the effect of compiler and compile time flags
on a given hardware. This way one build up an argument to switch from an
older gcc to gcc-3.1. In an environment with a lot of "never touch a
running system" people this could be helpful.

> Can you be more precise about your interests?  If this generates any 
> interest, how will you follow it if you choose not to subscribe to the list?
I am not a gcc developer, so the traffic of this malinglist is a lot for
me. There is a nice html archive of the mailing list at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/ which I use since some month. If I had more
time, than I would read each and every mail on the list and subscribe to
the list.

	Joerg