This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?


On Mon, 27 May 2002 19:16:49 +0200 Bernard Dautrevaux
<Dautrevaux@microprocess.com> wrote:

> declared and defined B::~B, so B seems NOT to be abstract...
> 
> 
> If I'm right above this does not apply, and so GCC-3.1 is in error.

I've posted this question on comp.std.c++ and so far 2 people have replied
and they agree with you. The program is valid and if GCC-3.1 doesn't chew
it, it's a bug.

MSB

-- 
Bad comments reveal the bad programmer.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]