This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Trying to Eliminate Warning Message


On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:-
> 
> > Well, yeah, but here we have someone with a legit use-case where the
> > warning is a problem, and no one has ever complained about the warning
> > being missing...
> 
> Actually, this case is not a good example, because a namespace is the
> one case that can be closed and re-opened at will.  In other words,
> there is no good reason for not closing the namespace in header1
> and re-opening it in header2.

My understanding was that Bill had a header that contained nothing
besides  "namespace foo {" -- it was being used like __BEGIN_DECLS in
glibc.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]