This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc compile-time performance

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk
Cc: jh at suse dot cz, aoliva at redhat dot com, chip dot cuntz at earthling dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: gcc compile-time performance
References: <20020518103822.GB9366@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><20020518.212549.16284693.davem@redhat.com><20020519073146.GB23224@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

   From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
   Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 08:31:46 +0100

   No-one has mentioned the fact that GCC >= 3.0 has the advantage over
   2.95.x of an integrated CPP

Probably because that tremendous advantage makes it even more
embarassing how much slower gcc is now. :-)

References:
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]