This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: espie at nerim dot net
Cc: jh at suse dot cz, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
References: <20020517185048.A16019@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr><20020517170016.GK22447@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><20020517190624.A19958@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr>

   From: Marc Espie <espie@nerim.net>
   Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:06:24 +0200
   
   I don't believe memory is an issue there. The machine I've run these tests
   on has 1GB of memory.
   
He means as in CPU cache misses, gcc touches more memory than
it used to.

References:
- Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]