This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 5904: maintainership of GNU Ada


On Fri, 3 May 2002, Joe Buck wrote:

> > The mainline gnat_rm.texi manual has FSF copyright notices.
> 
> Is there any reason for the branch to have a different manual?  Any code
> changes reflected in the difference?

There was a big code merge of Ada to the mainline only.  However, since so
far manual merges haven't been done simultaneously with code merges (part
of the work-in-progress nature of the integration - eventually hopefully
there will be fine-grained merges where docs go along with code), the
branch manual version may well not reflect the branch code version
accurately either.

Merging the mainline manual to the branch would fix all but one of the 
bogus ACT references mentioned in ada/6399, leaving just

	Ada Core 
	Technologies does not currently supply a suitable binding generator tool.

(and a "GNAT is maintained by Ada Core Technologies Inc" comment, and the
listing of ACT as author, which are separate issues).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]