This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, Raja R Harinath <harinath at cs dot umn dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:44:07 -0700
Subject: Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?
References: <d9d6wxx233.fsf@bose.cs.umn.edu> <d9d6wxx233.fsf@bose.cs.umn.edu> <20020418075205.GB27345@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <5.1.1.2.2.20020418101157.02885540@mail.lauterbach.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:29:47AM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Even that didn't cover all cases IIRC. If someone would come up with some 
> testcases specifying the desired semantics of attribute((weak)) vs. #pragma 
> weak vs. declaration vs. definition, I'm willing to work on it again.

Quite simple: attributes are sticky, and #pragma is a funny name
for an attribute.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?
  - From: Raja R Harinath
- Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c?
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]