This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tree inlining

From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars dot spam at nocrew dot org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "aoliva at redhat dot com" <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 15 Mar 2002 08:50:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Tree inlining
Organization: nocrew
References: <366070000.1016177572@gandalf.codesourcery.com><858z8ugtta.fsf@junk.nocrew.org><367910000.1016178413@gandalf.codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> --On Friday, March 15, 2002 08:43:13 AM +0100 Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> >> At some point, it appears that someone #if 0'd important assertions
> >> in tree-inline.c
> >> Does anyone remember why these changes were made?
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-09/msg00912.html
> Impressively quick memory!  That does indicate when it happenned.

No, just a quick Google search:

        site:gcc.gnu.org "All automatic variables should have"

-- 
Lars Brinkhoff          http://lars.nocrew.org/     Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting    http://www.brinkhoff.se/    HTTP programming

References:
- Tree inlining
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Tree inlining
  - From: Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: Tree inlining
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]