This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR1103

From: Alexander Sieb <alex at rnd dot org>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:15:59 +0100
Subject: Re: PR1103
References: <3C8F7AC6.F968D5DE@rnd.org> <20020313100307.C9484@lucon.org> <3C90DD82.C590E566@rnd.org> <20020314093109.A30950@lucon.org>
Reply-to: alex at rnd dot org

"H . J . Lu" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Alexander Sieb wrote:
> > "H . J . Lu" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:13:58PM +0100, Alexander Sieb wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if there will be a fix for this PR anytime soon (preferably 3.1).
> > > > I saw this PR appear in real life quite often, so I thought I send a little
> > > > reminder.
> > > >
> > >
> > > See
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg00160.html
> > >
> > > I have been using that for months now.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot. So #5577 is a duplicate of #1103.
> > Do you intent to merge your this patch with the mainline for 3.1.? ?
> >
> 
> All my gcc 3.1 builds have that patch included. Someone has to take
> a look at my patch to see if it should be included in gcc 3.1.
> 

I try to test your patch over the weekend and let you know about
the result(s). Do you have any testcases?


-- 
Regards,
	Alexander

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR1103
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- PR1103
  - From: Alexander Sieb
- Re: PR1103
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PR1103
  - From: Alexander Sieb
- Re: PR1103
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]