This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?

From: Martin von Loewis <loewis at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 26 Feb 2002 13:45:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
References: <200202201757.JAA23109@atrus.synopsys.com><3C7428E7.8B513C64@transmeta.com> <3C7B0EA2.8145BB72@apple.com>

Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com> writes:

> Incidentally, the kernel guy now reports that he has a remangler
> capable of converting all the 2.95 mangled symbols in Darwin kernel
> and drivers to their 3.1 counterparts.  Next is to try booting a
> 3.1-compiled kernel and see what happens when the 3.1 base classes
> actually load the 2.95-compiled derived classes that make up the
> drivers...

Not that this is relevant for the ABI discussions: but won't there be
issues with changes to object layout as well?

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
  - From: Jim Dehnert
- Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]