This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:18:06 -0800
Subject: Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
References: <20020217005638.A9525@redhat.com> <orofijmrfh.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221000218.B18952@redhat.com> <ory9hm60hw.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221124457.B19445@redhat.com> <orheoa5xdf.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:38:20PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> How about arranging for -fexceptions (implied or not) to imply
> -shared-libgcc (if a shared libgcc is available), and -fno-exceptions
> (implied or not) to imply -static-libgcc?

Um, ok, but how does this change the current situation one iota?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]