This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: rth at redhat dot com
Cc: pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:45:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
References: <200202181627.g1IGR2229200@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <20020218154457.A16667@redhat.com> <200202190015.g1J0FpL00902@greed.delorie.com> <20020218164005.A16769@redhat.com>


> If you use the 'p' or 'm' constraints, then reload may happily
> notice that your (reg) address needs reloading and that it is
> REG_EQUAL to a symbol_ref, which G_I_L_A accepts -> you lose.

Why doesn't reload verify the new pattern?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]