This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 07 Feb 2002 12:17:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202071702300.19375-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
Joseph> I'd be happy with the answer "gcc-bugs will get everything,
Joseph> gcc-prs will go away" (and don't really care what goes to
Joseph> java-prs), since I think the present multiple bugs lists (with
Joseph> a lot of duplication) are more complicated and confusing than
Joseph> necessary.
Generally speaking I'm interested in every Java bug report and in very
few reports against any other part of the compiler. Having a separate
Java list serves me well. That said, I don't care whether the
distribution mechanism happens to be a list or whether I'm simply
auto-CCd on every Java report -- just so long as I don't have to poll
the web server to see what is new.
Tom