This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status of Bugzilla?

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Feb 2002 09:16:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Status of Bugzilla?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202070239320.23274-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <3C61FFBD.7040209@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> If it is going to be run in parallel to GNATS for a trial
Bryce> period, it might be best to not import the old database into
Bryce> the new system while the old one is still "live". I can see
Bryce> headaches occuring if we end up having updates to the same bugs
Bryce> in two systems.

This is what happened when we merged the libgcj Gnats database into
gcc's.  It was a real headache.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of Bugzilla?
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Re: Status of Bugzilla?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Status of Bugzilla?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]