This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Your change breaks MIPS.


> On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:23:03AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:58:51PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 13:12, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > > Have you seen
> > > > 
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-12/msg00726.html
> > > > 
> > > > The last working one for me is
> > > > 
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2001-12/msg00292.html
> > > > 
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > I have verified that I can bootstrap the CVS on Dec 17 09:00 PST 2001,
> > but Dec 17 10:00 PST 2001 fails on mips. I got
> > 
> > alias.o differs
> ...
> > 
> > The only relevant changes are
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01900.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01658.html
> > 
> > Jan, could you please look into it?
> > 
> 
> I tried Dec 17 09:30 PST 2001. I got the same comparison failure. That
> means
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01658.html
> 
> causes bootstrap to fail on mips. You mentioned that you has tested
> your patch on mips. Did you mean bootstrap on mips or build a cross
> compiler for mips? Could you please fix your change?
> 
> BTW, am I the only one seeing bootstrap failure on mips?
I am just looking at it. Hope to have fix soon, but in case I will
not suceed this night, I have to wait for monday. Hope it is enought.
I apologize for the breakage.

The patch has been bootstrapped fully on mips on the branch and regtested
on mainline if I remmeber correctly. I currently don't have enought
disc space to bootstrap mips properly.

Honza
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]