This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How to understand gcc
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- To: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
- Cc: Axel dot Kittenberger at maxxio dot at, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, pinkfloydhomer at yahoo dot com
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:26:46 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: How to understand gcc
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:04:42 +0000
> To: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
> > Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> >
> > > Well that much of an arcane art how some people view compiler aren't the
> > > translors.
> >
> > PARSE ERROR AT OR NEAR LINE 1.
> > NO OBJECT PRODUCED.
> > COMPILATION ABORTED.
> My own proprietary normally brokenness-permissive compiler failed at
> the same spot :-)
I autocorrected this without even missing a beat. Hum, what does that
say about my processor v yours? Remember, be premissive in what you
accept and pedantic in what you generate, it isn't just a good idea,
it's the law; oh, wait, those two don't go together do they?