This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:43:58 -0800
Subject: Re: proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure
References: <200112142003.fBEK33524121@greed.delorie.com> <20011215172112.A8717@redhat.com> <200112160230.fBG2Uws31044@greed.delorie.com>

On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:30:58PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Allowing a string lets you simulate booleans but also allows you to
> have N-way "on/off" switches and TARGET_SWITCHES that can have boolean
> as well as specified options.

I'm unconvinced.  

> 	-mno-align	(provides default of 2)

-Os

> 	-malign		(provides default of 16)

-O2?  What is this supposed to mean, really?

> 	-malign=4
> 	-malign=8

-falign-loops=N

> 	-mhard-float	(provides default of "")
> 	-msoft-float	(provides default of " ")

On/off.

> 	-msoft-float=-lfloat

Huh?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: proposal: extend TARGET_OPTIONS structure
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]