This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A new regression from the inlining fix

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:53:53 +0000
Subject: Re: A new regression from the inlining fix
References: <20011214073449.A23284@daikokuya.demon.co.uk><wvlvgfab1ad.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><3C19C935.7A389BB5@codesourcery.com>

>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Jason Merrill wrote:
>> 
>> Actually, the problem was that Nathan stripped the '# lineno' lines when he
>> was fixing tests to avoid implicit typename.  I've put them back, and the
>> test passes again.

> huh? oh I see, it contains implementation/interface pragmas. I wonder
> why I didn't notice a fail.

FYI, because the problem was masked by inlining.

Jason

References:
- A new regression from the inlining fix
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: A new regression from the inlining fix
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: A new regression from the inlining fix
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]