This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 02:03:05 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs
References: <20011206153316.H10398@tornado.cygnus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112062205030.18572-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20011206154741.B9641@redhat.com> <20011206223106.A18374@tornado.cygnus.com>

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:31:06PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Absolutely.  That's why I wanted to ask for suggestions before I
> kept doing changes to the branch.  I'm going to start looking at
> language hooks.  What would be a good place to start looking for
> examples?

I'd expect that you'd need little or nothing in the way of hooks.
I'd expect the language f.e. to build the function, translate any
language dependent nodes to language independent nodes, then pass
the whole thing off to you.

So I'd focus on the language independent nodes first.

r~

References:
- Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]