This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Assembly in Gcc

From: "Mark Cuss" <mcuss at cdlsystems dot com>
To: <gcc-return-42228-mcuss=cdlsystems dot com at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:27:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Assembly in Gcc
References: <20011204153416.A24659@disaster.jaj.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112042032530.27017-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20011204155032.A24992@disaster.jaj.com> <00d001c17d05$4be398c0$160e10ac@hades> <3C0D3A05.6FE3602F@redhat.com>
Reply-to: mcuss at cdlsystems dot com


> Now it just so happens that I'm working on adding support of MS style
inline
> assembler in to GCC for the x86. It's in an advanced state and almost
ready
> to be submitted.

Graham,

That would definately make life much much easier :)  If you could let me
know when you think your converter will be ready that would be great.

Mark

References:
- Re: gcc-ss-20011203 is now available
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: gcc-ss-20011203 is now available
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: gcc-ss-20011203 is now available
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Assembly in Gcc
  - From: Mark Cuss
- Re: Assembly in Gcc
  - From: Graham Stott

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]