This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?


On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 07:42:57PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 07:38:02PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 07:20:27PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:17:14PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > > > David> config/rs6000/sysv4.h includes support for all ELF targets.  Thus all ELF
> > > > David> targets must include config/freebsd-spec.h to get the FreeBSD specs.
> > > > 	Why do configurations other than powerpc*-*-freebsd* need the
> > > > FreeBSD specs?  I don't see this done for any other architecture.
> > > 
> > > config/rs6000/sysv4.h targets all PowerPC ELF targets.  Ie, gcc on
> > > Solaris-PowerPC can target Linux-PowerPC.  Thus the specs for
> > > Linux-PowerPC must be visible [for all values of default targets].
> > > Same for FreeBSD.  FreeBSD's specs are in a central file, thus that
> > > central file must be included.
> > 
> > Are you talking about the cross compiler here?
> 
> No.  Please read rs6000/sysv4.h, mcall-* in particular.
>  

I think rs6000/sysv4.h is very misleading. It is more like elfos.h for
rs6000. I don't know why it is done that way.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]