This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:18:01 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
> It might be a good idea, but I don't think that enough people take
> GNATS seriously. [...]
> So, I don't think this is a good idea at present, since it would just
> clutter up GNATS.
I think it shouldn't necessarily be used for all patches, but for example
for patches that -- for whatever reason -- have not been reviewed even
after a reminder, to avoid those patches getting lost.
Then, as part of the release process, we could commit to reviewing all
GNATS reports of class "patches".
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/