This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: The bloat sweepstakes...

To: law at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: The bloat sweepstakes...
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:01:19 -0700
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20011022003928.E3425@codesourcery.com> <18687.1003759370@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:02:50AM -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
> A short may work.  Then again it may not -- we've certainly seen
> costs overflow a short in the past on some ports.

Differentiate between the cost as used to accumulate from
the per-move cost.  The later is what we wish to store in
the arrays, not the former.

r~

References:
- Re: The bloat sweepstakes...
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: The bloat sweepstakes...
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]