This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 02:09:23 +0200
CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: Universita' della Tuscia
References: <200110102222.PAA08822@atrus.synopsys.com> <3BC4D749.B95DA8F@unitus.it> <20011010165819.A12422@redhat.com>
Reply-To: pcarlini at unitus dot it

Richard Henderson wrote:

> >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-09/msg00217.html
>
> This is actually a new bug.  It very much post-dates the
> back end rewrite.

Sure, between 3.0 and 3.0.1.

However, I'm still wondering if perhaps such kind of specific problems my
slightly penalize Intel processors with respect to AMD ones in both absolute and
relative terms (Joe Buck argued for a progress from 2.95.3 to 3.0 to 3.0.1 on
AMD). What do you believe?

Thanks for introducing me to partial register stall issues!!
Paolo Carlini.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
  - From: Tim Prince

References:
- Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: compiling linux kernels with GCC 3.0
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]