This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: questions of gcc compiling.

To: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Subject: Re: questions of gcc compiling.
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:44:56 -0700
Cc: Jack Cummings <jack at ice dot mudshark dot org>, "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, lyq at sunny-capital dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com
References: <200109250545.NAA06688@mail.jia.net> <20010925101410.A1544@us.ibm.com> <ydd7kun88sa.fsf@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <20010925.124343.71550573.davem@redhat.com> <20010925125341.A28561@ice.mudshark.org> <15281.53566.766141.232752@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> While the bi-arch config is certainly far more convenient
> (and you get by with a single gcc supporting both modes),
> there may be advantages of the sparcv9-only mode (some better
> optimizations?).

No there isn't.


r~

References:
- questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?=
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Jack Cummings
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]