This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: host_integerp vs [] decls

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:00:06 -0700
References: <200109141954.PAA09127@greed.delorie.com> <20010914144112.B15655@redhat.com> <200109191921.PAA10620@greed.delorie.com> <20010919123743.A32396@redhat.com> <200109192009.QAA15781@greed.delorie.com> <20010919133611.A32428@redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:36:11PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Also update the documentation such that "deprecated" is now
> "illegal".

Didn't we decide that "invalid" was preferred to "illegal"?

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]