This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC
- To: amylaar at onetel dot net dot uk, thomascanny at yahoo dot co dot nz
- Subject: Re: GCC
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@onetel.net.uk>
> To: thomascanny@yahoo.co.nz (=?iso-8859-1?q?thomas=20joseph?=)
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:05:21 +0100 (BST)
> Lack of a proper stack would be a more serious problem,
Isn't this inconsequential? One can always dummy up a stack trough
convention, just as one dummies up more registers through convention.
In fact, don't most risc cpu do exactly this anyway? [ thumbing
through my mips book ] I don't see any mention of a stack anywhere in
my mips book. Doesn't seem to be a problem in the least.
:-)